Tuesdays with Tolkien: Lady of Rivendell

The claim that Tolkien created very stereotypical female characters is of course quite without basis; Éowyn in especial comes to mind. However, whilst Tolkien can be cleared of this charge, perhaps Peter Jackson cannot be. His Arwen is undeniably far different from Tolkien’s original character. I would like to look at the characters of Arwen in the books and Arwen in the movies, and then to decide in which medium she is more cliché.

Arwen & Aragorn 3.jpgIn The Lord of the Rings book, we see very little of Arwen (other than in the appendices). She is mentioned first at the feast in Rivendell, and Tolkien describes her in detail, saying that Frodo had never before seen “such loveliness in living thing.” After this she is barely mentioned save in passing until The Return of the King when Aragorn receives the banner which she made for him. And again she basically drops out of the story until she arrives with Elrond in Minas Tirith.

The scriptwriters for the film expanded this small part significantly. Replacing Glorfindel, Arwen saves Frodo from the Black Riders. She becomes a much more obvious motivation for Aragorn’s character, encouraging him before the Fellowship departs from Rivendell (this mostly in flashbacks later on). A subplot is added in which she allows Elrond to convince her to take the ship from Middle-earth and almost goes through with it, only returning when she sees a vision of her and Aragorn’s hypothetical future son. Her subsequent loss of immortal Elven life is played for all it’s worth. Near the end of The Return of the King, she and Aragorn are reunited at his coronation and the love story comes to a happy end.

In the books, we see barely enough of Arwen to know much about her. We know little more than that she is the daughter of Elrond, as lovely as Lúthien; the romance between herself and Aragorn is merely hinted at until her coming to Minas Tirith. Going by this minimal information, she may indeed seem stereotyped. However, there is something else to be considered. In most of fantasy literature, the gorgeous female sidekick is given a main part e9ef89ee736636064072df1cdd52be24to play, especially in motivating the hero. Tolkien does not give any such role to his Arwen; she is in fact one of the least-mentioned characters throughout the book.

This mistake, however, is committed by the scriptwriting trio. Out of Arwen’s ten or so appearances across the three films, four involve her giving Aragorn ‘pep talks’ or otherwise encouraging or helping him. Approximately the same number of scenes is devoted to her teary departure from and return to Rivendell and the consequences of her choice to remain.

Whilst there is little of which to accuse Tolkien, there is much of which to accuse the scriptwriters. Arwen’s first appearance, in which she rescues Frodo, seems an attempt to portray her as an action heroine; during the rest of the film trilogy her character goes downhill until she becomes merely the might warrior’s gorgeous but wimpy love interest. This may seem harsh, but I believe it is true. It is clearly in the films that she is a stereotype, not the book.

This essay was originally published in The Ivy Bush, May 2015.


5 thoughts on “Tuesdays with Tolkien: Lady of Rivendell

  1. In fact, I must admit I like the fact that Tolkien doesn’t play up this romance between Arwen and Aragorn. I love that there are hints at it – like their standing close to each other in Rivendell or Aragorn’s being all dreamy at Cerin Amroth. We know that there’s something that we are not told about in full and it’s extra appealing. There remains some mystery about this romance up to a certain moment in the narrative.


    1. And that’s the way I like it – some mystery about the romance. I don’t mind a certain emphasis on a romantic subplot, but only as it serves the story or characters, and that done respectfully. Aragorn and Arwen’s is not particularly important to the narrative. Yet what there is of it is masterfully painted in subtle strokes. 🙂

      Liked by 1 person

    1. Absolutely! Even if Merry was more instrumental in the Witch-king’s actual demise (which is one POV – his sword was forged specifically in enmity with Angmar, and IMO probably weakened the wraith so that Eowyn’s stroke finally destroyed him) (and that was longer than I intended it to be…), Eowyn’s valiance in standing up to him in defence of Theoden was epic.

      Liked by 1 person

What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s